A group of Black New Yorkers is demanding [1] cash payments as the only acceptable form of reparations, with activists telling state officials that nothing short of direct checks can deliver what they call “true justice.”
The push came during a public hearing held by New York’s Community Commission on Reparations Remedies, a body created under a bill signed by Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul in 2023 to explore potential “reparations” options for Black residents.
Aubrey Muhammud, one of the attendees at the hearing, did not mince words.
“We need $800,000 for each foundation of Black Americans. That’s simple,” he told Fox News Digital.
“That’s about the cost of living in New York, enough to buy a home, start a small business, or recover from any financial duress.”
To many taxpayers, that sounds less like justice and more like a government jackpot.
WATCH:
The Empire State’s commission follows the same pattern popping up in far-left cities across the nation, where local leaders are bending to activist demands for cash payouts.
In Evanston, Illinois, the city already handed out $25,000 checks to certain Black residents to supposedly make up for old housing discrimination.
That program is now tied up in legal challenges questioning its constitutionality.
At Saturday’s hearing, commissioner Seanelle Hawkins thanked attendees for “lending their voices” to the process, explaining the event’s theme of “truth before repair.”
However, critics say the so-called “truth” being presented is selective and more about handouts than healing.
The hearing invited residents to share personal stories, which activists believe should inform how the state awards future reparations.
Some speakers insisted the cash-only route is essential.
Rex Burns proposed creating a new version of the historic Freedmen’s Bureau that would function “like a central bank” for Black America.
He said it should distribute funds specifically to “foundational Black Americans,” a term describing individuals whose ancestors were enslaved in the United States.
The group calling itself The United States Freedmen Project appeared prominently at the hearing.
Its supporters argue that the reparations debate should focus solely on lineage, not race, claiming many immigrants who identify as Black did not descend from American slaves.
According to the group’s website, they want to “fulfill the abandoned missions” of the original federal Freedmen’s Bureau after the Civil War.
“The bill being pushed by New York includes language that violates the Constitution,” the group contends, insisting that payouts must be “lineage-based.”
In other words, even some reparations activists are fighting over who should get the taxpayer-funded prize. Brooke Lean, another supporter, told Fox News Digital that “it shouldn’t only be a check, but it should start with a check.”
She explained that only after payments are made should the government address “education, redlining, and policing” concerns.
Tanasia Poke took that argument even further, saying financial compensation is the only way to achieve what she called “true justice.”
She claimed that race-based disparities in finance and policy have done the most damage, so only money can make things right.
To many ordinary New Yorkers already paying nation-leading taxes, that pitch sounds like a demand to fix history by draining their wallets.
Assemblymember Michaelle Solages, who helped craft the reparations legislation, painted the commission as an inclusive process rather than a promise of direct payments.
“At the end of the day, we’re a collective state. We are many people in one,” she said, adding that the panel was designed “to hear from New Yorkers and deliver a report.”
But that vague language hardly reassures taxpayers who see this as another Democrat experiment destined to cost billions.
More residents who attended the hearing identified themselves as foundational Black Americans, reiterating their belief that reparations must come as cold, hard cash.
“I think that we are owed a debt,” said Caprice Reins.
That notion of an inherited bill for modern taxpayers mirrors the mindset spreading in progressive circles nationwide, where individual responsibility takes a backseat to collective guilt.
Rex Burns said cash payments must be “tangible.” “It’s right in front of you,” he stated.
While he also voiced support for “community building,” Burns warned that money could end up in the wrong hands.
Critics might remind him that “wrong hands” often describes bureaucrats who design these redistribution schemes in the first place.
The reparations debate has raged in California as well, where similar panels have proposed staggering payout figures running into the hundreds of billions.
If New York follows that same ideological path, the price tag could bury the state even deeper under its already massive debt, which has swollen under progressive governance.
Many Americans see this expanding reparations movement as a political distraction rather than a serious economic or moral debate.
After years of failed education reforms, rising crime, and dwindling affordability, Democratic leaders appear eager to dangle new promises of cash as a way to buy public goodwill.
The fact that activists now demand nearly a million dollars per person in the name of “justice” shows just how out of touch the movement has become.
While its supporters brand it as moral restitution, the entire concept of government-run reparations is another example of progressive overreach.
It rewrites history through financial gimmicks and stokes division under the false banner of repair.
With New York stepping into the same trap as California and Illinois, taxpayers could soon find themselves footing the bill for someone else’s idealized version of justice.