New Black Panther Party national chairwoman Krystal Muhammad wasted no time turning a narrow courtroom development into a rallying cry for Karmelo Anthony, the man convicted of murder and sentenced to thirty five years in prison.
Outside the Collin County Courthouse on Wednesday, she celebrated [1] a judge’s removal and demanded Anthony’s freedom.
Standing amid Anthony supporters, Muhammad chanted before declaring, “Black Power. It’s about goddamn time. Our power to the people. That’s the first step. Now we need for Karmelo [Anthony] to be released.”
She also accused District Judge John Roach Jr. of racist conduct, citing limits on courthouse access and disputed jury instructions concerning self-defense.
Her argument was sweeping, but the actual ruling did not validate those accusations or disturb the jury’s verdict.
Visiting Judge Sid Harle removed Roach from handling proceedings connected to Anthony’s request for a new trial.
The decision followed arguments from Anthony’s lawyers that comments Roach made after the trial created an appearance that he could not fairly consider their motion.
Roach had told a reporter that the jury “got it right.”
WATCH:
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");
Rumble("play", {"video":"v7cbn3k","div":"rumble_v7cbn3k"});
Anthony’s legal team seized on those four words, and Harle agreed that another judge should decide the pending motion, a procedural change that Anthony’s allies quickly dressed up as vindication.
The conviction remains intact. So does the thirty five year sentence, meaning Wednesday’s ruling did not open a prison door, overturn the murder case, or transform Anthony into an innocent man despite the courthouse theatrics.
Muhammad’s reaction made clear that her goal reaches far beyond a neutral review of judicial procedure.
She treated the recusal as the opening move in a campaign to secure Anthony’s release, even though a jury already weighed the evidence and convicted him.
According to the organization’s biography, Muhammad joined the New Black Panther Party in 2002 and later led its Houston chapter.
She has served as national chairwoman since 2013, placing her at the forefront of the group’s latest effort to cast the case as a racial cause.
The New Black Panther Party is not officially affiliated with the original Black Panther Party.
That distinction has not stopped its members from borrowing the imagery, slogans, and confrontational politics associated with the older organization.
Evidence from the immediate aftermath of the stabbing has long complicated attempts to portray Anthony as merely a victim of the system.
Police camera footage captured him telling officers, “I’m not alleged. I did it,” after they arrived.
Following Anthony’s conviction, members of the group gathered outside the courthouse and pushed the same racial narrative.
One activist called the country racist and described the case as a war, language designed to inflame a crowd rather than clarify the facts.
Muhammad’s demand came one day before prosecutors disclosed disturbing evidence that the original jury never heard.
At a hearing on the motion for a new trial, Collin County prosecutor Bill Wirskye described allegations involving Anthony’s former girlfriend.
Wirskye told the court that the former girlfriend reported Anthony for allegedly stalking her on the morning Metcalf was killed.
The report was reportedly made to school officials roughly one hour before the fatal stabbing at the track meet.
Prosecutors also described text messages in which Anthony allegedly wrote that he was “on the verge.”
They said he fantasized about stabbing someone and licking blood from the blade, material that could have sharply altered how jurors viewed his state of mind.
That evidence was not presented during the original trial because prosecutors and defense lawyers had reached an agreement limiting damaging character evidence about both Anthony and Metcalf.
The arrangement kept inflammatory material away from jurors on both sides of the case.
WATCH:
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");
Rumble("play", {"video":"v7cbnm2","div":"rumble_v7cbnm2"});
Now Anthony’s supporters are celebrating a judge change while prosecutors are placing darker allegations into the public record.
The contrast is hard to miss, one side is shouting slogans about power while the other is detailing evidence the first jury was never permitted to consider.
A new judge will decide whether Anthony receives a new trial, and that legal question remains pending.
But recusal is not exoneration, and Muhammad’s demand for immediate release looks less like justice than a political pressure campaign wrapped in racial theater.