Texas state legislator James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas, is facing criticism from Republican leaders and political commentators after an earlier social media post about “white skin” resurfaced and drew sharp reactions ahead of the November election, as reported by The New York Post.
Talarico, who defeated U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) in Tuesday’s Democratic primary, secured the party’s nomination in the race for one of Texas’ two U.S. Senate seats.

Democrats have not won a Senate seat in Texas since 1988.
Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?
MORE NEWS: Stephen A. Can Yell All He Wants, but He Does Not Get to Decide if NASCAR Drivers Are Athletes
The controversy centers on a post Talarico shared on X on May 8, 2020. In the message, he linked the COVID-19 pandemic with discussions surrounding systemic racism following the killing of Ahmaud Arbery in Georgia.
“White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus,” Talarico’s full post read.
“But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious.”
White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus. But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious.
— James Talarico (@jamestalarico) May 8, 2020
The resurfaced post prompted criticism from several Republican officials and commentators.
FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott responded directly to the message, suggesting it could damage Talarico’s chances in the general election.
“If this is a real Talarico post, he is toast,” Abbott said. “This is Tim Walz clone territory. He could win in Minnesota, but not in Texas.”
If this is a real Talarico post, he is toast.
This is Tim Walz clone territory. He could win in Minnesota, but not in Texas. https://t.co/8gpOUyPpnQ — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) March 4, 2026
Abbott is currently seeking a fourth term as governor.
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) also weighed in on the remarks, criticizing the language used in the post.
“Left-wing zealots are very, very different from ordinary Americans. Among other things, they are open racists,” Cruz said.
Left-wing zealots are very, very different from ordinary Americans.
Among other things, they are open racists. https://t.co/OJAeKFCA3i — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) March 5, 2026
Additional criticism came from Iowa Solicitor General Eric Wessan, who objected to the framing of the statement.
“Officials should not treat people differently based on skin color. There is nothing magic in Mr. Talarico’s complexion. It’s not infectious, evil, or bad,” Wessan said.
He added, “To the extent he is trying to attack ‘the West’, that’s wrong too. Stereotyping whiteness as KKK or confederate is gross.”
Officials should not treat people differently based on skin color. There is nothing magic in Mr. Talarico's complexion. It's not infectious, evil, or bad. To the extent he is trying to attack "the West", that's wrong too. Stereotyping whiteness as KKK or confederate is gross https://t.co/W5IM0Ripuo
— Eric W. (@EWess92) March 4, 2026
Political commentators and media figures also commented on the resurfaced post.
Journalist Josh Barro suggested that Talarico should address the remarks directly.
“Talarico should try something unusual that worked for [New York City Mayor] Zohran Mamdani: He should apologize for bad past comments,” Barro wrote. “Mamdani didn’t win skeptics over just by being handsome and charming — he announced that he had changed and said he was sorry. (Kamala should have tried this too!)”
Talarico should try something unusual that worked for Zohran Mamdani: He should apologize for bad past comments. Mamdani didn't win skeptics over just by being handsome and charming -- he announced that he had changed and said he was sorry. (Kamala should have tried this too!) https://t.co/On0TVcqckq
— Josh Barro (@jbarro) March 4, 2026
Commentary editor John Podhoretz referenced a previous remark from Talarico while discussing how the statement could affect the campaign.
“Add this to ‘God is non-binary,‘ and you have a Republican campaign against him,” Podhoretz said, referencing a 2021 video in which Talarico used that phrase during remarks on the floor of the Texas legislature.
Add this to "God is non-binary" and you have a Republican campaign against him. https://t.co/7xJkTbgb5b
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) March 4, 2026
Fox News contributor Mary Katharine Ham also commented on the resurfaced message.
“There’s a rational desire from Dems to find a candidate who didn’t say this stuff publicly in 2020-22, so they can pretend they didn’t put us all through this nonsense,” Ham said. “But it will be hard to find a non-R person old enough to run for office who didn’t [because] ‘silence was violence.'”
There's a rational desire from Dems to find a candidate who didn't say this stuff publicly in 2020-22, so they can pretend they didn't put us all through this nonsense. But it will be hard to find a non-R person old enough to run for office who didn't bc "silence was violence." https://t.co/JY4iI4XWAw
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) March 5, 2026
Talarico’s campaign responded to the criticism through spokesman JT Ennis.
“While they lob stale attacks to mislead Texans, we are uniting the people of Texas to win in November,” Ennis said.
He continued, “Our campaign is building a movement poised to change the politics of this state and take power back for working people.”
Ennis also accused several Republican officials of attempting to undermine the campaign.
He said U.S. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Abbott, and “the billionaires who prop them up” are “scared of James Talarico for good reason.”
The Democratic nominee will face the Republican candidate in November. On the Republican side of the race, both Cornyn and Paxton advanced to a May 26 runoff after neither candidate secured a majority in the party’s primary election.
Texas voters will ultimately decide the race during the November general election.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Share your opinion
COMMENT POLICY: We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, hard-core profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment!