Texas Tech and the Big 12 found resolution after Brendan Sorsby’s latest decision.

ESPN’s Pete Thamel reported on Monday that Sorsby, the Texas Tech quarterback, plans to enter the NFL supplemental draft. His decision ends what had evolved into a legal dispute involving the NCAA, Big 12, and Texas Tech following his admission of gambling, which included 40 bets on his own team.

One week earlier, a Texas judge granted Sorsby an injunction permitting him to play in 2026. The Big 12 then began discussions about possible sanctions against both Texas Tech and Sorsby, leading Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to warn of additional litigation.

A new development followed Monday morning when the Big 12 filed a federal lawsuit. The filing sought clarity on the conference’s authority to penalize the university for violating conference bylaws.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

By choosing to pursue a professional path instead, Sorsby prevents additional legal conflict between those entities. The decision spares the parties from more courtroom proceedings.

While Sorsby’s exit creates near-term challenges for Texas Tech, it also removes the risk of continued damage to the university’s standing. The move relieves the school from further reputational controversy.

Before arriving in Lubbock, Sorsby had been considered one of the premier quarterbacks in the transfer portal. He completed 61.6 percent of his passes for 2,800 yards, recording 27 touchdowns and five interceptions, while rushing for 580 yards for the Cincinnati Bearcats during the previous season.

His recruitment had carried major implications for Texas Tech. The Red Raiders, who had secured their first Big 12 championship and appeared in the College Football Playoff last year, were viewed as national title contenders for 2026 after Sorsby’s transfer was announced.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Objectivist.co, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Now, his departure leaves the Red Raiders without a clear quarterback option. Backup Will Hammond is recovering from a torn ACL and faces uncertainty about returning for Week 1.

Lloyd Jones and Holden Phillips combined for six pass attempts last season, both entering 2025 as freshmen. Tulsa transfer Kirk Francis threw three touchdowns and four interceptions across three games before being benched.

The roster also includes three-star freshman Stephen Cannon, who joined during the 2026 high school recruiting cycle. He adds depth to a quarterback group now searching for stability.

If Texas Tech had kept Sorsby active despite his gambling admissions, the decision could have produced internal and external consequences. Programs such as Georgia and Nebraska publicly signaled reluctance to compete against Texas Tech in any sport if Sorsby remained on the field.

That reaction might have expanded across the collegiate landscape had the university moved forward with him as starter. By his own action to enter the supplemental draft, Sorsby removed that potential friction point for the Big 12.

His decision eliminates a lingering dispute that had threatened to strain relationships throughout the conference. For the Big 12 leadership, the move allows focus to return to league competition instead of legal defense.

Although the entire ordeal left Texas Tech’s handling under scrutiny, the latest turn enables the university to begin moving past the incident. The headline-fueled tensions now give way to the task of rebuilding its public perception.

In stepping away before another season unfolds, Sorsby left both Texas Tech and the Big 12 with clarity they lacked just weeks earlier. For the time being, the supplemental draft marks the conclusion of one of college football’s most contentious off-field chapters of the offseason.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.