For years, the establishment press has strained every nerve trying to connect Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.

They have recycled every rumor, twisted every redaction, and ignored every inconvenient fact.

But the latest reporting from The New York Times Magazine, of all places, has backfired in spectacular fashion.

Buried in its thousands of words is an admission that Epstein was not a Trump ally at all, but in fact obsessed with trying to find dirt on him, only to come up empty-handed.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

The Times, which never misses a chance to cast Trump in the worst possible light, published a massive deep dive into Epstein’s final days behind bars.

The supposed point was to examine whether Epstein’s death was truly a suicide.

The left hoped, as always, that something damning about Trump might surface along the way.

Instead, what emerged was evidence that Epstein desperately wanted to hurt Trump.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

The notes the Times obtained made that abundantly clear.

In handwritten pages discovered from Epstein’s time in jail, the disgraced financier struggled to think of anything incriminating to offer prosecutors about Trump.

His scribbles were petty, speculative insults rather than revelations of any real connection.

Epstein scrawled phrases like “Trump is a total con artist, smoke and mirrors” and “Never had money.”

That hardly sounds like the words of a close friend, and it certainly is not evidence of shared wrongdoing.

The Times itself even noted that Epstein’s attorneys were considering a deal with federal prosecutors that would involve turning over information useful in other cases.

Epstein apparently fixated on Trump as a potential bargaining chip.

But he found nothing of value.

The man who counted the world’s powerful among his friends could not conjure even a shred of real dirt on the one man the left insists must be guilty of everything.

If anything, Epstein’s ramblings demonstrate how little of substance ever tied Trump to his orbit.

The two moved in the same wealthy Palm Beach circles decades ago, as many socialites did.

When news broke that Epstein was facing criminal charges for sex trafficking, Trump praised the investigation and cut ties completely.

There was no collaboration, no friendship, and nothing to hide.

That truth, of course, runs directly against the left’s narrative.

Democrats and their media allies have spent years trying to reinvent Epstein’s relationship with Trump into a political weapon.

It did not matter that Epstein’s actual political allies included Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

The left’s obsession has always been about guilt by imagination, not evidence.

WATCH:

Yet now even the New York Times, likely without meaning to, has confirmed that the Epstein story does not implicate Trump.

Instead, it highlights how twisted the media obsession has become.

Epstein’s own writings portray a vindictive man searching for leverage, not a trusted confidant covering up for a powerful friend.

The liberal press cannot avoid admitting the facts, even when those facts rip holes in its preferred story.

Ironically, while the Times did confirm that Epstein tried and failed to smear Trump, its lengthy article was less convincing on the question of how Epstein died.

The newspaper described an absurd series of “coincidences” inside the Manhattan jail, missing rounds by guards, failed cameras, sloppy evidence collection, and contradictory autopsy findings.

The writers eventually waved those away as a sad collection of human error.

That explanation would draw laughs if it were not so serious.

Even so, in one of its few measured moments, the report admitted that the Epstein death mystery might never be solved.

It called the entire saga a “perfect petri dish for conspiracy theories,” which is quite the understatement.

For years, both sides of the political divide have speculated about exactly how a man with so many high-level connections was able to die alone in a cell under supposedly tight supervision.

Still, the most striking revelation is not about how Epstein died but about what he failed to do while alive. He desperately wanted something, anything, to barter against his sentence.

He tried to dredge up information on Trump and could find nothing beyond shallow insults.

For a man known to manipulate those around him, even through fear or blackmail, that failure speaks volumes.

It is unlikely the Times meant to vindicate Trump in any way.

The publication has made a career of spreading anti-Trump insinuation.

But facts can be stubborn things. Once those notes surfaced, the conclusion became unavoidable.

Epstein may have wanted to harm Trump politically, but he had no ammunition.

The story liberals hoped would confirm Trump’s guilt has only reinforced his innocence.

Just as predictable, left wing commentators have glossed over this revelation, pretending the Epstein notes are insignificant.

But the truth is that their favorite narrative has collapsed under the weight of genuine evidence.

The more the left tries to connect Trump to Epstein, the clearer it becomes that the connection never existed.

What remains is a glaring example of how the mainstream press, in its blind hatred for Trump, keeps helping his case instead.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.