Jennifer Lopez ignited a wave of backlash after boldly defining what it means to be a true New Yorker, and the response from former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio was anything but mild, as reported by The Blaze.

Appearing on "SubwayTakes with Kareem Rahma," the Bronx-born singer and actress declared:

"Everybody wants to claim our city, but you have to be born in New York. You have to be born in one of the five boroughs to be a New Yorker."

Her comment instantly stirred controversy, drawing sharp criticism from de Blasio, who led the city from 2014 to 2021. He slammed Lopez’s definition as "absolutely outrageous."

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

"There is no purity test," de Blasio insisted, arguing that New York is the "ultimate city of immigrants."

The former mayor, who has long championed immigration, doubled down in remarks to the New York Times. He asserted that the city’s culture is defined by openness, not birthright.

"In fact, it's been the opposite," he said. "We've said, 'Come here and become one of us.'"

De Blasio, now 65, described his personal connection to the city in terms of time, family, and love rather than birthplace. He emphasized that he was born in Manhattan in 1961 but feels his New Yorker identity stems from his life in the city.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

"This place gave me everything in life," he shared. "Your definition of home is the place that means the most to you. New York City has been my whole world."

Lopez, however, made clear that sentimental or experiential ties were not enough in her view. During her interview, she reiterated that being born in one of the city’s five boroughs was the determining factor of authenticity.

"I have to say, no, you live in New York," she said. "You take on characteristics of New Yorkers. ... When you're born in New York is when you're really a New Yorker."

Her words underscored a sense of exclusivity that clashed directly with de Blasio’s inclusive philosophy. For Lopez, even fifty years of residence could not match the lived experience of being born and raised in the city.

The exchange drew attention for highlighting a recurring New York debate: who truly gets to claim the title of New Yorker.

It also showcased the contrasting visions of two prominent figures linked by their deep ties to the city, yet divided by their belief in what makes it home.

Before ending her segment, Lopez briefly turned to a different subject, calling for schools to focus more on “self-love” from elementary through college levels. She argued that emotional intelligence should be as valued as academic success.

“Because they teach us things intellectually, but an intellectual motherf**ker with no emotional intelligence is dangerous! It's a dangerous person. Okay?” Lopez said, wrapping up the impassioned conversation with a characteristic edge.

The debate over her definition continues to ignite reactions across social media, with many weighing in on where the true spirit of New York resides — in birthplace, or in belonging.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.