Scott Galloway, the left wing commentator and NYU professor who has made a comfortable brand out of blasting President Trump and nodding along with big government politics, is suddenly discovering something conservatives have warned about for years.

The government machine does not stay aimed only at the people you dislike.

Galloway is now objecting after New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration published a searchable database tied to a proposed pied à terre tax, aimed at owners of valuable second residences in the city.

The irony is thick enough to pave Fifth Avenue.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

According to the report, the database was released by the city’s Department of Finance and allows users to search properties while viewing the names and addresses of owners whose non primary residences could fall under the proposed tax.

A department spokesperson reportedly said the publication of the property roll was required by state law, which is the usual bureaucratic shrug when government decides ordinary privacy is optional.

Galloway, who apparently had no problem with aggressive left-wing taxation in theory, sounded a little less enchanted once his own name landed in the government spotlight.

“I’ve been doxed,” the liberal professor announced on the podcast.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

He continued, “I don’t know if you’ve heard, but Mayor Mamdani has decided to release a list of the 950,000 residences with addresses and names that might be eligible for his pied à terre tax.”

That is the thing about class warfare politics, it sounds bold and righteous at cocktail parties until the mob starts reading from a list that includes your address.

Co host Kara Swisher, not exactly a voice from the conservative wilderness, also seemed uncomfortable with the move.

“I don’t love this,” Swisher said.

“I can’t say I love this. It feels a little bit like doxing. Just tax them and get on with it is my feeling.”

That comment captures the mindset perfectly.

The problem, in her view, is apparently not the punitive tax grab itself, but the messy public naming part that makes the ruling class feel a little exposed.

For years, the left has sold tax hikes as moral theater, where successful people are cast as villains and politicians ride in as heroes with spreadsheets.

Now Mamdani’s administration appears to have added a public shaming component, and some of the same people who cheered big government are noticing that bureaucrats are not famous for restraint.

Galloway was especially sharp in describing the city’s approach.

“He’s taken a legitimate source of tax revenue, and he’s turning it into a wanted poster,” he said of Mamdani’s tax list.

WATCH:

Galloway also questioned the point of putting names and addresses in front of the public, especially in a political climate where anger can move quickly from online outrage to real world danger.

That concern is not hard to understand, even if it is rich coming from a political universe that routinely treats privacy and due process as inconveniences when the target is on the right.

The Mamdani administration’s database reportedly focuses on owners who may be subject to the proposed tax on valuable second homes.

In practical terms, that means the city is taking a revenue proposal and attaching to it a public list that critics say could invite harassment or worse.

Conservatives have long argued that once government gets addicted to targeting disfavored groups, it rarely stops where its cheerleaders promised.

Today it is wealthy second home owners, tomorrow it can be small landlords, business owners, political donors, or anyone else who becomes useful in the next campaign speech.

There is also a deeper lesson here for blue city voters who keep empowering politicians who see private property as a piggy bank.

When voters hand power to ideologues who believe government should punish success, they should not act shocked when those ideologues start building tools to identify exactly who owns what.

Galloway’s sudden discomfort is revealing because it shows how quickly abstract left wing policy becomes personal when the tax collector turns up at the professor’s own door.

He is not wrong to be alarmed about a government list that can be searched by name and address, but he is late to the party.

The conservative critique has always been simple.

Government power does not become safer just because the person wielding it uses progressive slogans.

Mamdani’s tax push may have been packaged as another hit on the wealthy, but the backlash from Galloway shows that even liberals can recognize a warning flare when it lands on their own lawn.

For New Yorkers already tired of being treated like walking revenue streams, this episode is another reminder that left wing governance always starts with promises of fairness and somehow ends with more taxes, more lists, and less privacy.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.