Retired General Michael Flynn says he never would have accepted a 2018 plea agreement with Special Counsel Robert Mueller if federal authorities had disclosed the complete FBI evidence from his case.

Newly released records reveal notable differences between agents' handwritten notes and the official interview summary used to support his prosecution.

“Had I seen that evidence that you have broken, no way in the world,” Flynn told the Just the News, No Noise television show.

His remarks came hours after President Donald Trump's administration released fully unredacted versions of the FBI records.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

The documents concern Flynn's January 24, 2017, interview with FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka.

Prosecutors later alleged that the former three star general lied during that interview about conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Handwritten notes taken by the agents do not always align with the typed summary placed into the FBI system more than 20 days later.

That official summary, known as an FD 302, eventually became a central piece of the government's case against Flynn.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Flynn believes those differences tear apart the foundation of the false statements charge.

“In fact, they would have had no ground to stand on to charge me with anything, and they knew it. They knew it from the beginning,” he said.

Flynn's defense team received redacted versions of some records roughly a year after his conviction and placed portions into the court record.

Wednesday marked the first time Flynn had reviewed the documents without the convenient black boxes that kept crucial information beyond his reach.

“There is a lot of new information that I was not aware of,” Flynn said.

He added that the FBI's statements to the court “didn't reflect hardly anything of what was actually the truth.”

Flynn said he pleaded guilty under crushing pressure because prosecutors were threatening to target his son.

“The background of the plea was because of you know the seriousness of what they were going to do going after my son for no reason at all,” he said.

President Trump pardoned Flynn in November 2020, and the Justice Department formally ended the prosecution.

Flynn nevertheless insists that the pardon does not erase what investigators and prosecutors did while pursuing the broader Russia collusion narrative.

“It's not water under the bridge. It has to be exposed,” Flynn said.

“We have to bring these people to account.”

WATCH:

The White House Government Transparency Task Force released the Strzok and Pientka notes as federal prosecutors intensify a grand jury investigation.

That inquiry is examining whether the FBI's Russia investigation became a criminal conspiracy designed to damage Trump and his allies during the 2016 election and its aftermath.

Strzok has denied wrongdoing in previous testimony and in a book defending the FBI investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane.

The newly public records, however, offer Americans the chance to compare what agents wrote during the interview with what later appeared in the polished FBI account.

Prosecutors claimed Flynn falsely denied asking Kislyak to avoid escalating tensions after the Obama administration imposed sanctions and expelled 35 Russian diplomats.

Pientka's handwritten notes attributed a striking statement to Flynn during the interview: “Hey, don't do anything.”

The official FBI summary presented Flynn's response differently, stating that he did not remember discussing the expulsions or sanctions.

It quoted him as saying, “Not really. I don’t remember. It wasn’t, ‘Don’t do anything.’”

Pientka's earlier handwritten version instead recorded Flynn saying, “Not really. I don’t remember. Hey don’t do anything.”

His notes also indicated there was no “long drawn out” discussion about the matter, but they did not show Flynn categorically denying any conversation with Kislyak.

The records also conflict over how many telephone calls Flynn remembered making while vacationing in the Dominican Republic.

The official summary said Flynn recalled four or five calls, while both agents' handwritten notes indicated that he did not remember making that number.

Strzok's notes quoted Flynn as saying, “If so, don't remember. If so, busy place to make phone calls.”

Another handwritten notation similarly stated that Flynn did not remember making four or five calls and described the location as a poor place to call.

Flynn later sought to withdraw his guilty plea after hiring attorney Sidney Powell.

She argued that Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page altered the interview summary, and their publicly revealed text messages showed them discussing substantial edits before the document entered the bureau's system.

Flynn filed a civil lawsuit in 2023 alleging malicious prosecution and political targeting because of his connection to Trump's campaign.

After an earlier dismissal, he filed again following Trump's return to office, and Attorney General Pam Bondi's Justice Department settled the case in March 2025 for approximately $1.2 million.

The latest disclosure gives fresh weight to Flynn's argument that investigators possessed evidence that could have changed his decision before the plea.

It also raises another uncomfortable question for Washington's permanent bureaucracy: who will answer for keeping that evidence hidden while a decorated general was branded a liar?

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.