WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Maher says Trump is more relaxed and informal inside the White House.
  • He says Trump never pulled rank during their private conversations.
  • Maher challenged Trump over viewing Supreme Court rulings as personal.
  • Trump acknowledged that he had taken one court decision too personally.

Bill Maher says his private interactions with President Donald Trump have revealed a side of Trump that differs sharply from the public persona he often presents outside the White House.

Maher described his experiences dining with Trump and said the president appears noticeably more relaxed and informal when speaking privately at the White House. According to Maher, Trump does not rely on the authority of the presidency during their conversations, even when Maher speaks candidly or challenges him.

Maher also suggested that Trump feels particularly comfortable inside the White House because of its security.

"And he also feels safe. And for a guy who they tried to kill three times, I don't blame him. Like they said on 60 Minutes a couple of weeks ago, it is the safest place in America. Yeah."

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

Maher said that sense of security appears to affect Trump's demeanor when he is at the White House compared with his behavior elsewhere.

"So he feels he's just so imperious when he's out of the White House, and when he's there, the total opposite."

Maher said his private conversations with Trump have not involved the type of formal hierarchy that someone might expect when speaking directly with a sitting president.

"He never pulls rank, no matter how flippant I get. He never goes. How dare you say that in the White House?"

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Objectivist.co, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Instead, Maher characterized Trump as approachable and conversational during their meetings.

"I mean, I can talk to him just like I talk to any guy at a bar, and he does sound like a guy at a bar."

Maher's observations went beyond Trump's personality and included how the president discusses politics and government institutions.

Maher said Trump can sometimes demonstrate a clear understanding of how government is supposed to function while, at other times, interpreting institutional decisions in more personal terms.

"Well, but he just he seems to like go in and out. There are so many moments where he gets it."

Maher offered an example involving Trump's reaction to Supreme Court decisions. He recalled challenging Trump over comments suggesting that the Supreme Court was voting against him personally.

"Like I said to him, you know, when you said the Supreme Court, they're voting against me. You know that's not how the Supreme Court is supposed to work, right? It's not about they're not voting for against you. You appoint them, and then they make decisions."

According to Maher, Trump acknowledged the point rather than becoming defensive about being challenged.

"And he went, "Yeah, I took that one too personally.""

Maher viewed that response as an example of the contrast he has noticed during his conversations with Trump. In his telling, the president was able to recognize that Supreme Court justices are expected to make independent decisions after receiving lifetime appointments, even if those decisions do not align with the president who nominated them.

Maher nevertheless said he sees an inconsistency in Trump's approach to those issues.

"See what I mean? He gets it, and then he doesn't get it."

The comments provide another glimpse into Maher's personal interactions with Trump after spending time with him away from the usual format of political speeches, rallies and television interviews.

Rather than describing a formal or confrontational atmosphere, Maher said Trump has allowed him to speak freely during their private discussions and has not objected when Maher questions his statements or interpretations.

His account of the Supreme Court conversation also showed that their discussions have included substantive disagreements about presidential power and the independence of government institutions.

Maher's overall description presented two different sides of Trump: a public figure he views as more commanding outside the White House and a more informal president during private conversations inside it.

For Maher, the Supreme Court exchange illustrated both Trump's willingness to acknowledge criticism privately and what Maher sees as a tendency to move between understanding institutional independence and interpreting political developments through a personal lens.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.