WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Abdul El-Sayed and Mike Rogers debated ahead of Michigan’s November 3 Senate election for the seat vacated by Sen. Gary Peters.
  • El-Sayed supports abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement, secure borders, and mass amnesty for illegal aliens already living in the United States.
  • His agenda includes Medicare for All and moving Michigan to 100% renewable energy despite the state’s reliance on traditional vehicles.
  • Michigan has about 100,000 registered EVs, compared with more than seven million vehicles powered by internal combustion engines.
  • Seizing an estimated $60 billion to $100 billion from Michigan billionaires would barely affect the nation’s $40 trillion debt.

Abdul El-Sayed and Mike Rogers faced off last week in a debate ahead of the November 3 election. The two candidates are competing for Michigan’s Senate seat vacated by Sen. Gary Peters.

The debate put El-Sayed’s agenda under a bright spotlight, exposing sharp tensions between his assurances and the policies he supports. Immigration, Medicare for All, energy mandates, electric vehicles, and billionaire taxes all emerged as major points of scrutiny.

El-Sayed has called for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement. During the debate, however, he also said he wants the United States to maintain secure borders, leaving voters to weigh how those positions could possibly operate together.

That was not the only immigration contradiction. El-Sayed called for open borders a few years ago, yet during the debate he advocated mass amnesty for illegal aliens currently living in the United States.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

MORE NEWS: ABC Anchor’s Goofy Communist Spin Gets Flattened by House Majority Whip [WATCH]

Abolishing the federal agency responsible for immigration enforcement while promising secure borders is already a difficult political sell. Pairing those positions with mass amnesty only makes the border portion of his platform harder to square.

Health care brought another sweeping promise. El-Sayed claimed Americans would be able to keep their doctor if the country enacted Medicare for All, echoing an assurance previously made by former President Barack Obama.

The proposal would represent a major shift in the nation’s health care system, but El-Sayed presented it with the familiar promise of continuity for patients. His claim asks voters to accept that a broad government program would not disrupt their existing relationships with doctors.

Energy policy creates an even bigger collision with Michigan’s industrial base. El-Sayed has called for moving Michigan to 100% renewable energy, a policy that would kill Detroit’s auto manufacturers according to the criticism laid out against his agenda.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Following recent reports that Congress is considering a nationwide voter ID requirement for federal elections, do you support requiring voters to show identification before casting a ballot?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Objectivist.co, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

He has also opposed oil and gas companies that provide the fuel used to drive vehicles and the gas used to heat homes. Those positions carry particular weight in a state known for vehicle manufacturing and long, cold winters.

Michigan consumers, meanwhile, have largely rejected electric vehicles. About 100,000 EVs are registered in the state, compared with more than seven million vehicles powered by internal combustion engines.

That enormous gap shows just how far consumer behavior remains from the energy and transportation transformation El-Sayed supports. His agenda would push Michigan toward electric vehicles despite the overwhelming preference reflected in current registrations.

El-Sayed promotes a money-in-your-pocket message, but the policies he backs would raise energy bills for Michigan residents. The branding sounds friendly enough, but higher household costs are hardly a financial gift.

Close

MORE NEWS: Mullin Erupts at Margaret Brennan for Blaming ICE After Criminal Alien Endangered His Child [WATCH]

During the debate, El-Sayed repeatedly attacked Rogers over higher gasoline prices. Yet banning pipelines and forcing consumers to drive electric vehicles would also increase prices while pushing energy costs higher during Michigan’s long winters.

His hostility toward traditional vehicles is not new. In 2016, El-Sayed compared cars to cigarettes, a revealing comparison in a state where the automobile industry remains central to the economic concerns raised by his energy plans.

El-Sayed also claimed that taxing billionaires could solve the nation’s $40 trillion debt. The numbers presented in support of that criticism show why the promise simply does not add up.

Between eight and 11 billionaires live in Michigan, and their wealth is not sitting around as liquid cash. Those individuals own companies that employ thousands of people and pay dividends to stockholders.

Even seizing all of their money would produce only about $60 billion to $100 billion. That amount would not make a meaningful dent in $40 trillion of debt, while the seizure would also throw many people out of work.

The debate therefore left El-Sayed doubling down on a collection of costly and contradictory positions. Secure borders somehow accompany abolishing immigration enforcement and mass amnesty, while promises of lower financial pressure run alongside policies expected to raise energy costs.

His billionaire tax arithmetic fares no better. Against a $40 trillion national debt, a maximum estimated seizure of $100 billion is not a solution, no matter how aggressively the class warfare sales pitch is delivered.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.