Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez managed to spark yet another firestorm this week after she reimagined the American Revolution as a sort of eighteenth-century class war.

Speaking at the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics, the New York Democrat declared, “The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time.”

It was a bold statement, and also a spectacularly wrong one.

Ocasio-Cortez attempted to wrap her usual anti-capitalist rhetoric in the cloak of the Founding Fathers, linking their fight for liberty with her socialist talking points about modern wealth inequality.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

She went on to say that Americans today are “declaring independence from such an extreme marriage of wealth and power and the state.”

WATCH:

In her telling, Jefferson, Washington, and Franklin were essentially proto-socialists leading a worker’s revolt.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

But as every competent high school history student could tell her, the Revolution was born out of resentment against the British Crown and Parliament’s oppressive taxes and controls, not a campaign against rich merchants.

The real trigger was government overreach, tyranny without representation, and the abuse of political power by a distant monarch.

From the Stamp Act to the Tea Act, colonists rejected being treated like an ATM for the empire.

“No taxation without representation” was their rallying cry.

They were not railing against successful businessmen but against an unaccountable government that refused to recognize their rights as citizens.

The Declaration of Independence laid out this mission clearly.

Jefferson’s words targeted King George III’s violations of liberty and his refusal to honor the consent of the governed.

The founders risked everything for self-rule, private property, and freedom from centralized control. The suggestion that they were protesting rich people is laughable.

Sen. Mike Lee of Utah did not mince words in his reaction.

“No, AOC, the American Revolution was NOT ‘against the billionaires of their time,’” he wrote on social media.

“It was against a large, distant, overly intrusive government that recognized no limits over its own authority.”

Sen. Ted Cruz also joined in on the historical correction.

“If a 9th grader writes this on her history test, she gets an F,” Cruz quipped.

He added, “It was literally a revolution against oppressive government… the very thing AOC wants to inflict on all of us.”

Cruz even reminded her that the Revolution was funded by American enterprise, not by protest mobs.

The irony here is that some of the very men Ocasio-Cortez invokes were themselves quite wealthy.

George Washington was among the richest landowners in Virginia. Benjamin Franklin built his fortune as a printer, inventor, and publisher.

Robert Morris, often called the financier of the Revolution, put his personal wealth on the line to keep the Continental Army afloat.

These men were not crusading against wealth; they were defending the right of individuals to prosper free from an overbearing government.

The founders sought to create a system that restrained political power through checks and balances, federalism, and constitutional limits. It was about liberty, not envy.

Critics argue that AOC’s distortion of history is more than just poetic license.

It reveals a broader problem on the left, where revisionism has become a political weapon.

By reshaping the founders into progressive revolutionaries, she attempts to retrofit her socialist agenda into the American story itself.

While there is no denying that early Americans expressed suspicion toward concentrated power, that suspicion was directed at government tyranny first and foremost.

The founders understood that freedom meant allowing individuals to build, trade, and succeed without interference from monarchs or bureaucrats.

Using the Revolution to justify higher taxes, more regulation, and bigger government is an insult to everything the patriots fought for.

The concept of limiting central authority is foreign to modern progressives, who see every problem as a reason to expand federal control.

AOC’s version of history is less about education and more about propaganda.

Her latest remarks are another reminder of how casually the left treats historical truth.

By twisting America’s founding principles into a tale of economic jealousy, they erode understanding of what genuine liberty means.

The Revolution birthed a nation devoted to free enterprise and individual rights, not one obsessed with punishing success.

Every time Ocasio-Cortez tries to redefine history, she invites well-deserved mockery.

The founders did not storm the barricades to create socialized envy.

They risked their lives so that Americans would never again live under rulers who claimed absolute power.

The fact that a sitting congresswoman cannot grasp that basic truth says a lot about where the modern Democratic Party stands.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.