Dr. Anthony Fauci is discovering that old television clips have a nasty habit of surviving, especially when they collide with new testimony on Capitol Hill.

His 2022 promise that he had nothing to hide is now looking like one of Washington’s more spectacular about faces.

Back then, Fauci sounded eager, almost cheerful, about the prospect of congressional scrutiny.

"I am very happy to testify before any congressional oversight committee," he told CNN in 2022.

Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?

He did not stop there. "I have nothing to hide. I can explain and validate everything that I’ve done… I’m going to do what I need to do, and that is cooperate fully, because we have nothing to hide at all," he added.

WATCH:

Fast forward to Wednesday, and the former face of the federal Covid response had a very different message for the Senate.

FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest

Rather than explain and validate everything, Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times.

Under the guidance of his attorneys, Fauci declined to answer questions from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and others on the committee.

The subjects included his role in the pandemic response and questions surrounding gain of function research.

The contrast was impossible to miss. In 2022, Fauci sounded like a man eager to clear the air, but in the hearing room, he sounded like a man whose lawyers had replaced the old media script with a much shorter one.

Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to Fauci for comment about his earlier statement.

The silence around that request only added more fuel to a story already loaded with political dynamite.

Fauci argued during the hearing that Paul has an "obvious obsession" with trying to see him prosecuted.

That is a familiar Washington move, when pressed on substance, question the motives of the person asking the questions.

He also claimed Paul’s release of more than 1,000 pages from his personal diaries was designed to "get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, quote, behind bars, unquote."

Fauci told the committee that he respected the legislative branch and had a long record of cooperating with Congress.

Then, following his attorneys’ advice, he invoked his constitutional right not to answer the committee’s questions.

Paul, who has led the push to scrutinize Fauci’s conduct, is not treating the Fifth Amendment pleas as the end of the matter.

He is now raising a sharp legal question tied to Fauci’s reported presidential pardon.

"The legal question is, if you're pardoned, can you really claim the Fifth?" Paul asked during an appearance on "The Will Cain Show."

That question matters because the Fifth Amendment is designed to protect witnesses from incriminating themselves.

Paul’s point is that if a pardon already removes criminal exposure, then the legal ground beneath Fauci’s refusal may not be as solid as his attorneys would like.

For years, Fauci enjoyed a level of media protection usually reserved for liberal icons and endangered Democratic talking points.

He was presented as the voice of science, while Americans who questioned school closures, mandates, origins theories, or federal guidance were treated like troublemakers.

Now the same man who repeatedly assured the public that he could explain everything has chosen not to answer anything.

WATCH:

That is a remarkable development for someone who became one of the most powerful unelected officials in America during the pandemic.

The newly released diary materials have also intensified scrutiny of Fauci’s mindset during the crisis.

Critics say they reveal a public health official deeply aware of his celebrity status while the country was still reeling from deaths, lockdowns, and economic chaos.

Paul is seeking a vote to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after the former public health official refused to answer questions 111 times.

That effort sets up another major fight over accountability for the decisions made during the pandemic years.

Millions of Americans remember the closed classrooms, ruined businesses, forced masking, shifting guidance, and smug lectures from the expert class.

They were told to stop asking questions and trust the science, and now the man most associated with that command is leaning on the Fifth.

Fauci may have had plenty to say on CNN when friendly cameras were rolling.

But under oath, before a Senate committee, his famous confidence suddenly gave way to silence, and that silence is now the story.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Objectivist. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.